Overview & Reviews

The big news is the arrival of the S60 2.4T AWD and its slick electronically controlled all-wheel-drive system. Additionally, all S60 models get Emergency Brake Assistance (EBA), enhanced traction control performance and improved throttle management, resulting in quicker response in everyday driving situations. Volvo's Dynamic Stability Traction Control (DSTC) system is now standard in T5 models and optional for the 2.4T AWD (starting in December 2001). Other model-specific changes include satellite controls on the steering wheel and rear cupholders for the base 2.4 model and a memory function for the power seats and mirrors in 2.4T and T5 models. The entire lineup gets revised rear headrests, ISO-FIX child restraint attachment points and an emergency trunk release handle.

• Long list of standard safety features, luxurious interior, powerful turbocharged engine in top-line T5 model, deceptively quick 2.4T powerplant, available all-wheel drive.

• Handling lacks true sport-sedan precision, expensive optional equipment, torque steer in the T5 model.

User Reviews:

Showing 1 through 10 of 135.00

• 

  Volvo S60 Surprising Value - 2002 Volvo S60
  By batman - November 9 - 10:00 am

  Ive owned Volvos exclusively for the last 11 years. Each one has impressed me in terms of safety, reliability, and a generally "solid" feel that never seemed to wear off. When looking for a new car, I ended up test driving other cars in the "luxury sedan" segment, only to discover that they didnt seem as well built (ex. Lincoln LS) or were much more expensive (BMW 3 series) when comparably equipped. This new Volvo is the first one Ive owned that really feels like a sports sedan. The 850 was close, but this sedan handles, accelerates, brakes, and looks sportier. For the money, its a great value.

• 

  Xus review - 2002 Volvo S60
  By He Xu - October 2 - 10:00 am

  The quality and reliability are very poor. This is not a trable-free car

• 

  Great car, but.... - 2002 Volvo S60
  By Silver Streak - September 20 - 2:00 am

  I looked at a few different cars and finally settled on deciding between the BMW 325 and Volvo S60 2.4T. I really think you get more for your money with the Volvo. Its a great car. Ive had mine for 2 months and have been very happy with it - except for one problem. Ill be selling the car soon because of this - but I was just unlucky with the dealer and Volvo Customer Service. My bad experience is probably a fluke, so Id recommend the car. Id just take the "We Care" slogan as advertising and not something to be relied upon.

• 

  S60 T5 - 2002 Volvo S60
  By Jackbenimble - August 19 - 12:46 am

  The S60 T5 is an extremely fast, comfortable, and "Safe" vehicle. The car feels a though it has an after burner because of the turbo engine. The seats in this car are the most comfortable I have ever ridden in. On long trips, you dont even realize you are sitting in a car. The car has more features than many others in the same category but, at a greater value. Overall, this is a great car which is safe, reliable, and value packed.

• 

  Volvo s60 more bang for the bucks than B - 2002 Volvo S60
  By jrw646 - July 9 - 10:00 am

  My wife and I tested a long list of cars before we came to the Volvo s60 2.4t. I wish we had gone to Volvo first. The ride is fantastic and the fit, finish and features are head and shoulders above the compitetion. We drove the BMW 325i, Acua TL, Mercedes C240, and Infinity I35. The BMW and Mercedes have 168hp the Tl 225 and the I35 255. Not one of these cars has the excelleration of the 197hp s60 turbo I5 motor. Both of the Japanese cars drive like american cars, soft ride, weak handling. The Volvo hangs in with both the mercedes and the BMW in terms of confidence and response.

• 

  S-60 2.4 - 2002 Volvo S60
  By ripplek - July 4 - 10:00 am

  this is my first European Sedan. (Finally made the break from Camry). MSRP on my Volvo is about the same as a loaded Camry XLE,but this S-60 offers so much more for the money. The seats are outrageous! I drove it 2000 miles this summer and was able to walk upon exiting the car. (cant do that in a Toyota). Great handling overall.

• 

  Mixed bag - 2002 Volvo S60
  By Mugsy1499 - June 25 - 10:00 am

  Was willing to pay extra, but shouldve paid attention. Features made way more sense in my S70, which was totaled. Loud road noise, no pre-set radio station buttons, clock and odometer off when key is off, big blind spots, transmission slips, door locks are slow & no choice of lock or unlock on door control - dumb! Has been in the shop over 10 times for transmission & a/c. Seatbelt chokes driver - cannot adjust. Even new wipers skip and squeal. Zippo rear leg room.

• 

  Not the car for me - 2002 Volvo S60
  By Mr. B - June 3 - 1:46 am

  I have had this car for 3 and a half years now and have more gripes about it as it gets older. There are bright some bright spots but it accelerates slowly (i run the car on premium and use synthetic oil btw) really gets slow after about 80, and has so-so handling. The car has left me stranded twice, things that have broken on it: the key would not remove from the ignition (dealer said theyve never seen this before), its AC turns on by itself when the car is sitting for over 40 minutes with no keys in it (dealer replaced the whole fan and it did nothing), the right side blows hot air and left side blows cold air and the dealer cant seem to fix it, the gas panel door has fallen off etc...

• 

  Solid Car and Fun to Drive - 2002 Volvo S60
  By Andy - June 2 - 10:00 am

  Steering and braking are excellent and have spared me from at least two accidents. Love the acceleration and handling at highway speeds. Leather interior is comfortable and has stood up exceptionally well to the wear and tear of two young boys. Will definitely buy another Volvo but only after this one wears out.

• 

  NO MORE VOLVO - 2002 Volvo S60
  By No More Volvo ! - March 27 - 11:40 pm

  Bought used in 2005 at 48,000 miles; regularly maintained after purchase. Engine death at 108,000 miles. Told it was "sludge" plugging the turbo, (despite our regular oil and filter changes.) Every minor thing cost an arm and a leg to fix. Blinker kept going out (short somewhere in system - ate bulbs like candy). Very expensive cost of ownership. The transmission was threatening to go, but the engine went first.