Overview & Reviews

The 2012 Nissan Murano sees only minor changes, including a new Platinum Edition option package for top-of-the-line LE models and a new 7-inch monochrome screen on the entry-level S trim level.

• Smooth ride
• High-quality cabin
• Responsive powertrain
• Spacious backseat
• User-friendly controls.
• Precise steering and confident handling

• Compromised rear visibility.
• Less cargo space than many rivals

User Reviews:

Showing 1 through 10 of 12.00

• 

  Not what we exoected - 2012 Nissan Murano
  By jmartinco - November 8 - 2:14 pm

  Bottom line, heres what were disappointed with: Leather seats are nice, but stiff and not comparable to the comfort in Volvo, BMW, VW or Lexus. Very noisy cabin...as bad on the highway as the 2004 Hyundai Santa Fe we were replacing. The rear view is definitely compromised...and seems dangerous. Exterior design sacrifices size for a sleek look, making it more difficult to park and maneuver than it should be. Navigation not user friendly. Dealership didnt give accurate info about the pricing incentives, making us decide on this vehicle prematurely. MPG disappointing. Would we buy it again? No way.

• 

  Extremely bad mileage car! - 2012 Nissan Murano
  By ozhukhov - April 20 - 12:21 pm

  Dont have a hope that the car will give you 18-23 mpg city/highway! In fact, it may be way below fine printed 14-20 mpg. I was unlucky to by Nissan Murano S AWD 2012 in July 2012. The car makes only 11-13 miles per gallon even if I drive very smoothly. It is bad in city and bad on highway. Checked with the service in the dealership - they found nothing wrong with the car. Third time the service director took the car on the series of test drives and measured the mileage himself. Not looking at the cluster display but actually running the car, measuring miles, topping the fuel and calculating the mileage. The numbers went out the same: 11-13 mpg. Nissan doesnt want to take the car back!