Overview & Reviews
After last year's revamping of the CLK coupe, the convertible (Cabriolet) follows suit this year, sporting the same sleeker body style, along with a soft top that boasts greater outward visibility than before as well as key fob-operated usability.
- Sleek styling, solid chassis, composed ride, comfortable front seats, fast power top operation in Cabriolet.
User Reviews:
Showing 1 through 10 of 129.00-
Overpriced poor body design - 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class
By djjs31 - July 6 - 10:00 amThis car is at least 20K over priced and the body style looks like a mercury topaz.
-
Disappointment - 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class
By Clemanto - December 17 - 10:00 amI got this car in May, 03 when my leased was ended with BMW 3 series. The CLK is powerful and hot looking. However, the quality is no comparison with BMW. The car engine is noisy, lack of cup holder, electronic problems like my navigation will suddenly go blank, the cd changer cant detact my cd and etc, AC is not cold, the stereo is not as good as i expect from BOSE ( Harmon kardon in BMW is better ). I am just wondering what Chrysler has done on this car and didnt expect paying over 58k would get this kind of car. After a year driving this car, i am swtiching back to BMW.
-
More attention to detail - 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class
By rjholtz001 - May 18 - 2:00 amWe had the same model in 2001. There have been imporvements to the "cowl shake" in the front end. The cup holder is ridiculous. It is high on the dash and out of the way to reach. There is only one cupholder. The 2001 had two cupholders in the center console (for use by both front and rear passengers. The Command Navigation System is primitive compared to the DVD based systems of Toyota and Lexus. It is difficult to operate and poor technology as well as not being accurate.
-
Very Disappointed With This Car - 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class
By TIM - July 18 - 5:36 pmWaited 5 months for car to be delivered. Within 3 months of delivery we had a leak in the transmission that left the car inoperable. After two visits, they replaced the trans. Next the Zenon headlight started shorting out; it had to be replaced. Next was alignment issues, this car will wear out top quality tires in less than 12k miles of normal driving! My car has had to be aligned 3 times in 2 years. Next was the seatbelt, the mechanism that hands you the belt had to be replaced. And finally, today my wife is at the dealership having a gear replaced in the tilt steering mechanism. I am so disappointed in this car! I thought I was buying the best, but, I got a lemon! Buyer beware.
-
Not worth the money - 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class
By HPBCPA - August 4 - 2:00 amDo not purchase the sport package with the low profile tires. They are damaged much too easily as these tires cannot handle the rigors of everyday driving in Chicago,
