Overview & Reviews

Changes are few on the 2007 Chevrolet Impala. The 3900 V6 adopts Active Fuel Management cylinder-deactivation technology, and a non-E85 version of the 3500 V6 becomes standard for California-level emissions states.

• Powerful and efficient engine choices, can seat up to six, high crash test scores, handsome styling inside and out.

User Reviews:

Showing 41 through 50 of 206.00

• 

  My Impala LTZ - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By T.Scott - June 17 - 10:45 am

  I leased my LTZ in March of 2007. I love almost everything about it, the only problems that I have is a persistent knocking sound in the rear of the car, and the suspension is a tad soft for my driving habits (which was fixed for the 2008MY with the FE3 suspension). Comfortable cruiser on the highway, which is important for me given my commute. Great car overall I get a lot of positive comments from random people about how nice it looks.

• 

  Nice car with lots of "extras" but ... - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By juzt-me - June 15 - 10:47 am

  The 2007 has lost of neat extras and they are mostly driver enhancements such as direction, mpg avg, mpg instant, temp outside, etc. I will be honest and say that I like the interior lay-out of my old 2003 Impala much better and this car seems smaller inside. But, I do like the steering wheel in the 2007 over the 2003 model, more comfy on the hands. The trunk is definitely smaller and does not have the back seat pull downs that allow access to the trunk or longer storage for those items that just dont quite fit in the trunk. The exterior of the 2007 is more sleek and sporty but I really like the look of my old 2003 better. The car is still amazing on mileage as I generally avg 30+ mpg.

• 

  Good car for the money - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By JEB - April 30 - 12:59 pm

  This is a company car and Ive put 45k on it in 15 months. Had problems with tires and they dont seem to keep in balance. Lots of car for the money and the gas mileage is excellent for the size of car. Six cylinder is peppy and relatively smooth. Went from a Lexus to this car, but not too bad for the cost of the car.

• 

  Good Value car - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By American Made - April 30 - 12:03 pm

  Purchased new 11/06,16,000 miles now. Running well, battery died 07/07, replaced under warranty. Fuel mileage about the same as 98 Lumina LTZ at 20 mpg mixed driving. The 3.9L engine has plenty of go. Wish that the interior had more space with smaller driver middle console and more rear foot room. Power seats really reduce the rear foot room. Have had several chips in the windshield, very odd. Re-circulation of cabin air now runs compressor hot or cold (same as air conditioner or defroster running) takes away fuel efficiency. Active fuel management is a joke. Hate traction control, but at least can turn off. Air filter location tight. Wind noise not good, door hanging quality poor

• 

  My 2007 Impala - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By Steven Trybulec - April 23 - 10:03 am

  Very nice design inside and out. Fit and finish excellent. Handles well, good pick-up, fair gas mileage. I am very impressed with this vehicle. A big improvement over my 2003 Malibu. My opinion on par with the Japanese.

• 

  2007 Impala rating - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By Judy and Bob - April 7 - 5:49 pm

  After riding in many friends Impalas, we decided to purchase one. The first time we sat in the car--uncomfortable seats. No headroom for hubby and absolutely no space for passengers in the back seat! Trunk can hold an army. Side view mirrors are quite small, beverage holder poor. A low ride. Large blind spot. Will trade this in soon for another Chevrolet of some type.

• 

  Disappointed - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By deano - April 6 - 9:45 pm

  Purchased LT3 with 3.9. Thought it was a classy car and good value. Performance is more than adequate for V6 but mileage is very disapointing. Previous car was 03 Impala with 3.4 which would easily get over 30 mpg on highway with high of 37mpg. I have to drive my 07 LT3 carefully to get 24/25mpg on the highway. I would think that with the technology Chevrolet put into this car - cylinder deactivation and variable valve timing - the 3.9 engine would do far better. Even my old 3.8 litre cars got better mileage than the 3.9 engine. Road noise and wind noise are also excessive. Too bad they couldnt get it right. This could have been a great car. Sorry, but my 2003 Impala was better.

• 

  This car has a lot going for it - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By JasonC - February 4 - 8:46 am

  My SS has all the options. Ive only owned this car for a month and have about 1000 miles on it. So far, Im very pleased with it. Car appears very well put together, best of any GM product Ive had experience with. I havent experienced any rattles or squeaks. Its hard to argue with the performance of this car. Suspension is a nice compromise between ride comfort and reasonable handling. A good driving car. Im averaging about 23mpg in mixed driving, but 30mpg looks doable on the highway. The fairly loose torque converter hurts the mpg in stop-and-go situations, and Im not sure exactly why they made that choice. Minor point, though, IMO. Seats are a bit flat, radio is ridiculous.

• 

  Can be better - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By chevy - December 13 - 11:50 pm

  I got the car in Jan 2007. My wife loved it. A good family car. Had 2 problems, the trunk would not shut, I got that fixed, and both brake lights stop working. But now its fine, kids love it. My wife had a Grand Prix, she loves the impala much more. Now Im happy and my wife and kids are happy. Overall its a good car

• 

  Give me the good old 3.8 - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By Mark R. Jacobson - October 16 - 8:56 am

  The LTZ was a nice update from the 2005 model. Tighter in every way, better styling inside and out, but the 3.9 AFM, with only an MPG of,(22-24), has me longing for the 3.8! Or, for a few grand more..."I could of had a V8!" To coin the ad. The outside mirrors could be a touch larger and I would give up a couple of inches of trunk spce for more rear leg room. Also, the drink holder. Need one in the rear and a better one in front. All in all a nice car that I will keep around for the time being. I bought it with six thousand miles from a used car store for only 16,800 plus tax and so on.