Overview & Reviews

Changes are few on the 2007 Chevrolet Impala. The 3900 V6 adopts Active Fuel Management cylinder-deactivation technology, and a non-E85 version of the 3500 V6 becomes standard for California-level emissions states.

• Powerful and efficient engine choices, can seat up to six, high crash test scores, handsome styling inside and out.

User Reviews:

Showing 111 through 120 of 206.00

• 

  This car has a lot going for it - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By JasonC - February 4 - 8:46 am

  My SS has all the options. Ive only owned this car for a month and have about 1000 miles on it. So far, Im very pleased with it. Car appears very well put together, best of any GM product Ive had experience with. I havent experienced any rattles or squeaks. Its hard to argue with the performance of this car. Suspension is a nice compromise between ride comfort and reasonable handling. A good driving car. Im averaging about 23mpg in mixed driving, but 30mpg looks doable on the highway. The fairly loose torque converter hurts the mpg in stop-and-go situations, and Im not sure exactly why they made that choice. Minor point, though, IMO. Seats are a bit flat, radio is ridiculous.

• 

  Can be better - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By chevy - December 13 - 11:50 pm

  I got the car in Jan 2007. My wife loved it. A good family car. Had 2 problems, the trunk would not shut, I got that fixed, and both brake lights stop working. But now its fine, kids love it. My wife had a Grand Prix, she loves the impala much more. Now Im happy and my wife and kids are happy. Overall its a good car

• 

  Great and Nice Car - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By HALLS - November 26 - 9:36 am

  This is a great car. It is very roomy. We sat in the back of a Ponatic GT Prix and it was way squished. We sat in the back of our Impala and it feels very roomy. We bought it because we wanted a roomy car because we have a baby we have to stick in the back and it fits great and there is still room. I love driving it. It has the get up and go very fast.

• 

  Give me the good old 3.8 - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By Mark R. Jacobson - October 16 - 8:56 am

  The LTZ was a nice update from the 2005 model. Tighter in every way, better styling inside and out, but the 3.9 AFM, with only an MPG of,(22-24), has me longing for the 3.8! Or, for a few grand more..."I could of had a V8!" To coin the ad. The outside mirrors could be a touch larger and I would give up a couple of inches of trunk spce for more rear leg room. Also, the drink holder. Need one in the rear and a better one in front. All in all a nice car that I will keep around for the time being. I bought it with six thousand miles from a used car store for only 16,800 plus tax and so on.

• 

  The Reason GM Is Dying - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By Rollin - August 13 - 4:20 pm

  GM should be embarassed to put the storied Impala name on this fleet-grade rental car. Nasty seating. Floppy handling and dynamics. 1970s-vintage interior materials and design. Ho-hum styling. Spastic tire-pressure-sensor monitors. Fritzy electronics. Mediocre power.

• 

  OK so far - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By Marty - July 30 - 2:03 am

  I have the base model with no options. The standard list of equipnment is impresive, far more than Toyota Camry and for a lot less money. This car is worth a look if you are in the market for a large sedan.

• 

  Great Car for the Money - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By Don - July 27 - 6:20 pm

  This is a decent car for the money. It has its quirks as most cars do, but its a good value. It rides and handles smoothly. I only gave the car a seven for build quality as after only six months the car began dripping transmission fluid. A trip to the dealer let us know the transmission casing needed to be replaced. The car was at the dealer for a week although they did provide a loaner. Other then that its holding up well.

• 

  Not very reliable - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By Steve B - July 22 - 8:20 pm

  Have been stranded twice with this vehicle. In both instances it was the security system that failed. It wouldnt allow the engine to start. Upon replacing the failed security system electronics, other electronics controlling the anti-lock brakes and tire pressure monitor subsequntly failed. Have problems with the front passengers side suspension (rattles) that are still not resolved. Vehicle was at the dealer for repairs to the suspension issue when it was discovered that the steering rack and axles needed replacement (this occurred at around 12,000 miles). Mileage when using E-85 falls by about 35% but vehicle operates fine with this fuel. Average vehicle, nothing special

• 

  Overall real good - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By Jerry - April 5 - 6:20 pm

  I have been driving my Impala for 600 miles. I realy like the feel, smooth but sporty. I think the color red did a lot for the sporty look.

• 

  I watied two months and a day - 2007 Chevrolet Impala
  By kw5kw - March 20 - 7:13 am

  I waited two months and a day for my new Impala to get here. I ordered it on 6/14/06 and it came in 8/15/06. I was on pins and needles waiting for it. Now that Its here I love it. I like the AFM (6cyl to 3cyl) for helping with fuel economy while it only has a few less hp (233hp) than the 1999 Mustang GT 4.6L 35th anniversary editon convertible (260hp) that Im replacing. Having said that, going from a RWD to a FWD and from a V-8 to a V-6 Im really noticing a lack of performance. Now, I realize that a sports car is supposed to run better and faster than a family sedan, so Im not comparing apples to apples, but Im really happy with the ride and performance of my new Impala!