Overview & Reviews
The 2010 Acura RDX receives a base front-wheel-drive version as well as revised exterior styling, automatic headlights, a tweaked braking system, a back-up camera, Bluetooth streaming audio compatibility, a USB jack and ambient footwell lighting.
- Sporty handling, stylish interior, nicely equipped, excellent crash test scores.
- Lackluster fuel economy, firm ride.
User Reviews:
Showing 1 through 10 of 38.00-
Avoid at all cost - 2010 Acura RDX
By David Collantes - August 8 - 10:56 amVery unreliable car, poorly manufactured. "Leather interior" is not quite leather, instrumentation will not give you details on battery not charging, or similar issues until it fully dead. Ride is not comfortable, "eats" gas like a monster. Overall craft of the car is poor. Will never buy an Acura again, unless it comes straight from Japan.
-
Overpriced so-so SUV - 2010 Acura RDX
By ezma - September 25 - 12:56 pmI hoped the turbo is fun to drive. In order to get a car like this, performance is a must, but it doesnt. Use premium gas plus high priced in maintenance, this car is failed to qualify as a luxury SUV. The NAV is the worse one on market. I dont even want to use it because the lack of touch screen. To operate the NAV feel so dump. Turbo kick in is similar to the down shift gear. Bit just too slow. I would say even RAV4 V6 is way better than this junk. So this is a way overpriced with really bad performed SUV. 2010 to 2012 are the same. 2013 and later changed to V6 but no more SH-AWD. I dont see whats the position of this SUV.
-
Wish I could return it - 2010 Acura RDX
By amit batt - October 5 - 5:07 pmWe bought this car to downsize from our Volvo XC90 - and be more "green". What a mistake! The mileage is no better despite the miserably small cabin and trunk (looks big but doesnt hold much). This car should never be bought by a family - if you are a young couple who doesnt drive far or carry much (or mind the 90+ dB road noise) , then, I have a vehicle for you.
