Overview & Reviews
Long overdue for a redesign, GMC's all-new Envoy finally gets the goods to compete in the highly competitive midsize SUV segment. An all-aluminum inline six-cylinder engine replaces the aging 4.3-liter V6, and a revised suspension dramatically improves the ride. Unlike the 2000 Envoy that was virtually indistinguishable from its Chevrolet and Oldsmobile siblings, the 2002 model now sports a new look that is unique to the GMC brand.
- Sharp exterior styling, strong six-cylinder power, attractive interior design.
- Numb steering, plasticky interior pieces, feels tippy in the twisties.
User Reviews:
Showing 71 through 80 of 161.00-
Encvoy -- a delight to own and drive - 2002 GMC Envoy
By JP Hoover - August 1 - 2:00 amI have owned an Envoy for nearly three years and as a former Bronco and Toyota owner I remain as pleased with it as when we bought it. I has plenty of power, rides like my brothers 03 Cadillac, and handles better than most other 4x4s. Except an inconvienent front cup holder (in front of the shift) and a gas tank that is too small (18 gal), it a treat to drive or ride in on long trips whether on long straight-aways in Arizona and Texas, the rolling hills and curves of Oklahoma and Arkansas, or the twisting mountain roads of Colorado. The GMC Envoy is a definite "two thumbs up" vehicle!!
-
great - 2002 GMC Envoy
By k9kibbles - June 1 - 2:00 amgreat vehicle, love to drive, great price, will by again, cant get enough of my envoy
-
Better than Jeep - 2002 GMC Envoy
By lubnag - May 30 - 10:00 amIts a great truck overall. Fun to drive, love the horse power and handle of this truck. Specially the look, make everyone take a second look when drove by them. The 6 disc BOSE system is awsome, plennty of power.
-
New SUV Owner - 2002 GMC Envoy
By tjanvrin - May 11 - 2:00 amThis vehicle is very good overall. It has great handling and ride comfort. I have been extremely pleased with my Envoy.
-
Gets me anywhere in style - 2002 GMC Envoy
By Yoga skier - May 8 - 2:00 amI ski the Colorado Rockies & actually use this SUV for what it was intended. Skiing in the winter, getting to trail heads in the summer. Totally dependable after 2 years & 23k. performance is good considering what kind of vehicle this is. Gas milage is reasonable at 18.5 combined city/mountain, 23 highway. Very comfortable. I am very satisfied and would recommend this truck.
-
Rays SUV - 2002 GMC Envoy
By Ray Helms - May 2 - 2:00 amI have owned this vehicle for two and one half years and have driven it 37000 miles. It has performed exceptionally well in every respect.I have not been disapppointed in any way.
-
Envoy - Great Vehicle - 2002 GMC Envoy
By JonRein - April 17 - 2:00 amThis vehicle is the best vehicle that we have ever owned. It has great features and good ride with plenty of power. It is loaded with options and is very luxurious.
-
Great SUV - 2002 GMC Envoy
By danshaffer - April 12 - 2:00 amGreat SUV, fun to drive, good quality. An overall great SUV to own. Would like to keep it forever.
-
Envoy Review - 2002 GMC Envoy
By Joe Envoy - March 12 - 2:00 amI have driven this vehicle for 36000 miles. It provides a good ride and reasonably decent handling. The inline six has plently of power for towing and going. The transmission shifts smoothly and firmly. The interior provides plently of room for dogs, suitcases and general gargo hauling. This SUV is comfortable, quiet and a joy to travel in.
-
Good, but could be better. - 2002 GMC Envoy
By harrydownsouth - March 5 - 2:00 amI am a commuter who drives 35 miles each way for work. I like the size of the car and that it has room to carry most items but is small enough to look sporty and it gets acceptable gas mileage. The interior is fine except for one area, its arm rests are hard plastic and are very uncomfortable during long drives. The model has had several recalls, none of which were serious for me. I am able to use regular gas without problem. I am concerned about the long term expectency of the aluminum alloy engine. GMC did OK but the hard plastic arm rests and the recalls make me think they were not as professional as they claimed and could be better.