Overview & Reviews

Inspired by the panel vans of the1930s, the Chrysler PT Cruiser caused quite a buzz when it was first released, for model year 2001. It was one of a few vehicles to herald the new retro trend and became an instant success.

As an entire decade passed, the PT's utility and versatility remained intact, but the hype surrounding it faded. Such was the life of the PT Cruiser: a bright spot for Chrysler that was ultimately left alone while other practical yet smartly styled hatchback/wagons were introduced. From a used car purchase standpoint, however, the PT is still a respectable choice, especially considering that you'll have plenty of examples to choose from given its decade in production.

Most Recent Chrysler PT Cruiser
The Chrysler PT Cruiser was produced from 2001-'10 as a four-door wagon, and from 2005-'08 as a two-door convertible. Despite sharing its platform with the much-maligned Neon, it drove better than its DNA would suggest. It was also versatile, with a maximum cargo space of 76 cubic feet, and there was ample seating space and headroom. The rear seats could fold down or be removed completely, and a two-tiered luggage area further enhanced the PT's usability.

Throughout its run, the standard engine was a 2.4-liter four-cylinder that produced 150 horsepower. A five-speed manual and four-speed automatic were available. Acceleration was adequate, but fuel economy was poor for a small wagon. For 2003, Chrysler added a turbocharged GT model; it originally produced 215 horses and later 230 for 2006. It was discontinued for '07. Those desiring more power after that time could opt for a 180-hp turbo engine on certain trims from 2004-'09.

Besides a minor interior styling refresh for '06 and the gradual addition of more features such as an auxiliary audio jack or Bluetooth, the PT Cruiser was otherwise unchanged.

In road tests, our editors found the Chrysler PT Cruiser to be an entertaining drive. It handled adequately, and its overall ride quality was smooth. The Cruiser's utility also bettered that of many compact crossovers. The main downsides included the tepid acceleration of the base engine and poor fuel economy. In its later years, the PT's design also became stale compared to newer competing hatchbacks and wagons. As for the convertible, its fixed roll bar made access to the backseat tricky and top-up visibility was a perpetual issue. We weren't enamored with it at the time, but it could be a good pick if you're looking for an affordable and stylish drop top.

User Reviews:

• 

  Love This Car! - 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By Korinne - March 5 - 11:23 pm

  I love this car. The fuel economy could be better but I have driven this car to Miami from Rhode Island and was comfortable the whole time. My mother drives a convertible BMW and she loves my car better than hers.

• 

  Get the extended warranty! - 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By GOGOTHECAT - February 25 - 9:40 pm

  Great looking with maintenance issues. Power steering hoses, AC freon leak, premature brake pad wear. Other than that, How was the play Mrs. Lincoln? Sporty fun has come with a price.

• 

  Gas mileage bust - 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By RHerr22594 - February 25 - 2:00 am

  My biggest complaint about PT automatic is that gas mileage is a disappointment. Driving conservatively the minimum average posted city driving rating barely met(20) more often then not it has been less. Highway driving have yet to achive average posted rating of (25)best to date has been (23)

• 

  Even better than 2003 - 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By nick - February 24 - 12:03 pm

  Had a 2003 pt and had exceelent experience no problems. Leased a 2006 and this one is even better quieter and even more solid than 03 Only drawback is still gas milaege poor for a 4 cylinder. around 18 to 20 mpg mixed driving. Would still recommend car.

• 

  Parking Challenged - 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By Still Cruising - February 20 - 7:36 pm

  I bought my Limited Turbo new. It was the styling that sold me. I love the roomy interior vs: the small exterior. Tall people dont do too well in the back seat however, (heads rub the roof). The original tires all went bad before 25K. Mechanically it has been sound. Has plenty of power for my needs. MPG could be better. Turning radius is wide so plan ahead, thats my only real beef right now. No issues as of 28K. Overall I have been happy with this car. Someday I may even calibrate the compass.

• 

  2003 Steel Blue GT - 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By SteelBlueGT - February 17 - 12:20 am

  Bought the car in late 2002 and it has given me over 40,000 miles of fun driving and very little trouble. An oil sending switch, a balky airbag light, and resetting the trip odometer is the only trouble so far. It does not burn oil in between 3000 mile oil changes. Original tires lasted 40,000 miles as did the brakes. Good on long trips and loves the highways. I get 19 mpg in town and 24 on the highways. Ride is firm but never harsh and handling is as good as it gets with my all season Yokohama performance tires. Interior comfort is great for both myself 6 Ft and wife 5Ft. Back seat is very roomy for four and a tight fit for five as the car is not that wide. Love the seating choices.

• 

  solid performer - 2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By ernie meri - January 28 - 8:10 am

  Very reliable,firm sporty ride. Grips the road well, but under powered. Still cant get used to window controls in center panel instead of doors. But great ride and no problems electrical or mechanical since delivery.

• 

  MY PT Experience -past 4 plus years - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By John - January 24 - 10:53 am

  I purchased my PT Cruiser new. I have enjoyed the automobile. I am disappointed in fuel economy for a 4 cylinder (I probably only average 20) and I have spent some good money in repairs (always after the warranty) which I did not have with my "foreign" cars that I owned previously.

• 

  Excellent car! - 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By Charley - January 12 - 1:15 pm

  I bought mine when it was 9 months old and had 7900 miles. My most expensive repair was $350 for a sensor. It was also my only repair in my ownership of the car other than routine maintenance (battery, tires, oil change). Ive owned it over 7 years. Couldnt be more pleased with it.

• 

  M1 ABRAMS - 2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  By PBrown - December 31 - 10:00 am

  At 14.5 MPG, a tank gets as good gas milage. And I think I should take stock in Exxon. Some things take getting used to: window switches, short shifting action, easy clutch.