Overview & Reviews
Classic styling and modern utility were the guiding forces behind Chrysler's PT Cruiser. Based loosely on the Neon platform, this small van offers a flexible interior, head-turning looks and, sadly, only 150 horsepower. A more powerful engine is already in the works.
- Unique styling, low purchase price, roomy and flexible interior.
- Only 150 horsepower, engine noise at high rpms, initial demand will exceed supply.
User Reviews:
Showing 1 through 10 of 147.00-
Great alternative to an SUV - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By lmatracia - October 4 - 9:51 amI have always wanted a car with a back-hatch (due to always owning large dogs). I purchased this car in 2011 with 132k from my mechanic. He combed through it with a fine tooth comb, so i knew it would be reliable. My car has leather seats, power everything and a sunroof. I enjoy the leather seats, being a dog groomer means lots of dog hair, but the leather is easy to clean. My only complaints are that the ride is a little noisy and rough (but i think it needs new shocks, being a 12 year old car), and i have had issues with the alloy wheels. the rims have slightly corroded (nothing visible to naked eye) but it was causing my tires to lose air regularly. bead seal was quick inexpensive fix.
-
great idea - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By Doug - July 6 - 3:10 amI think the PT cruiser is very ergonomically designed. Its very comfortable, easy to get around town in and great for picking up groceries, etc. We have had problems with its constant hesitation, but hope to get problem taken care of next week.
-
It just couldnt take it anymore - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By hawkybaby - June 21 - 1:30 pmDont get me wrong, I loved my Cruiser. I really did. The body, the interior, the functionality and versatility ... they were top-notch! The problem lied in long-term reliability. I drive around A LOT -- full time job, 3 kids, family living far away. I spend a lot of time in the car and on the road. It couldnt keep up with me. After 78,000 miles, I was burning oil like gas, the shocks went, there was an electrical problem causing 1/2 the car to go dark, the transmission slipped going into 2nd gear and she creaked worse than my grandmother did! I had already spent over $500 replacing the radiator, and decided to let her go.
-
Fun and versatile, with minor flaws - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By Stephen - July 7 - 12:50 amRock-solid reliable: I owned the car for three years, and had no problems at all with it. It took a while to get used to the limited rear visibility, but that was no problem after a week or so. Its underpowered - even with a 5 speed manual. Handling is *terrible* in adverse conditions - especially snow. Strange masking tape marks appeared on the corners of the rear bumper. All that being said, Id buy this car again in a second if I needed something that was both stylish and had the room to pack stuff in.
-
Great Car - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By Jeff - May 14 - 2:10 amIve put 85,000 miles on this vehicle and it still drives well. Its been serviced for brake shoes, new tires, and the drivers side power window. I had to replace the radio at about 50,000. Thats all. Not bad. Feels bigger than it is. Cruises well on the freeway at 80 mph. Still feels solid. Handles well for a FWD car. The build quality is more like a Honda than a US maker. Still no rattles.
-
Best Car Ive Ever Owned - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By Dennis - October 24 - 8:50 pmBought in 12/2001. Now has 98K. Replaced suspension & exhaust w/better quality aftermarket. Car has no lean into curves like other PTs. Replaced 16x6 wheels w/17x7. Replaced air cleaner w/cold air box for more power & better sound. Sunroof glass shattered, brake caliper bent, bad LED light but no other probs. Always synthetic oil. Never a prob w/inspection. Disabled & it fits my needs perfectly. Cargo area will gobble up anything you want to put in it. Fits 4 tall adults w/no complaints. Cant really fit 5 because of load limit not because theres not enough space. 3 recalls all important. One of the best designed cars Ive ever seen. Daimler cheapened subsequent years so avoid them.
-
Very pleased... - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By LittleSocrates - July 4 - 2:00 amMy used 01 PT was purchased a few months ago with high mileage - about 75k - from a dealer. Its a 5-speed, which really helps the 150hp engine with pick-up. The exterior is beautiful and seems so far to be well constructed and road-worthy. The interior is very comfortable, but has some odd control placements, and only the drivers seat has a center arm rest. For such a high mileage car (for its age) this baby has been a cherry piece. It still drives like the newer model I test drove, and is quite fun to pilot. Gas mileage could be better (I average 23), but it could be worse. All in all, excellent buy. I may well consider another.
-
Great, but could be better in snow! - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By cruisergirl57 - June 30 - 1:26 pmI purchased my Cruiser used a little over a year ago and have been pleased with the milage (I commute an hour each way to and from work and get about 28-30 hwy) but handles very poorly in snow. The brakes have sounded horrible since I bought it and even when checked, am told no problem. I am going to replace the brakes shortly and put on better tires for winter. Overall very nice car and my Inferno Red with custom striping is a head turner. Not for heavy use in Ohio winters. May be looking for an SUV!
-
MY PT Experience -past 4 plus years - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By John - January 24 - 10:53 amI purchased my PT Cruiser new. I have enjoyed the automobile. I am disappointed in fuel economy for a 4 cylinder (I probably only average 20) and I have spent some good money in repairs (always after the warranty) which I did not have with my "foreign" cars that I owned previously.
-
Burst baloon - 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser
By Debi - November 20 - 8:00 amThis is a fun vehicle to own and drive. I love it. The downside is Chrysler has changed parts company that have me replacing my control arm bushing because they split after 22 thousand Km. putting me outside the warrant period.