Overview & Reviews

User Reviews:

• 

  not a great choice - 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
  By BarbieCar - December 23 - 2:00 am

  We bought this car new 2 yrs ago and while we havent had trouble with it mechanically, it was a bad choice. My husband was in a head on collision in this car at 40 mph and the airbag failed to deploy. Theres no room for luggage and passengers in this car, you have to chose one or the other. It gets blown all over the place on windy highways & bridges,& the steering is so tight that the wheel turns itself when the tires hit small bumps. It makes for a very swervy ride.The soft top makes a lot of noise while driving. Overall it is fun to drive in the summer, but if its going to be your only transportation, you may want to reconsider.

• 

  joe - 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
  By Robert Tango - May 11 - 2:00 am

  The trim has some cheapness to it. The car was expensive in light of its subsequent, rapid depreciation. There was only one manufacturing defect.

• 

  Good, honest, basic, cheap 4WD jeep - 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
  By MikeinMO - February 6 - 2:00 am

  I bought the Tracker because it was the only GM model available locally with a 5-spd (I had GM$). The Tracker is not refined, comfortable, not a very good freeway car. It is fun to drive, great on dirt and gravel roads, gets better gas mileage than any SUV (24 avg), has decent cargo space and is reliable (check cons. rep.). It is much more Jeep-like than the CRV or RAV, but with GM$ and rebates its about $5,000 cheaper. I chose the 5 speed 4cyl, which drives like a late 80s Japanese truck but feels rugged and is fun and economical. With 4WD, PW, PDL and cruise, I paid (after rebates) $14,500. Ive had it for a year now, and like it more than when I first bought it.

• 

  stole it and fell in love - 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
  By purtycoolguy - February 3 - 2:00 am

  bought a fully loaded lease return for $10k...low miles and four wheel drive- got me through snow and ice in the mountains of colorado and new mexico, good traction and power for highway speeds...compared to other suvs it is not the gas guzzler others bought!!! love it "like a rock"

• 

  Better than a Rav4$ - 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
  By Minipins - December 28 - 2:00 am

  No Major Problems. V-6 is a must!! Has good power. Stereo needs improvement. Lots of interior noise once over 60mph. Cruise takes awhile to kick in once turned. Worth getting the LT Loaded.

• 

  Big space in small package - 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
  By GaryODS - October 16 - 2:00 am

  We bought this rig to save us some fuel (also have a Dodge 1500). We bought the 2.0 L inline 4. While its a little weak, it makes up for it by being frugel. We broke this one in fast and loose crusing in the 75-85 MPH range from CA to Denver and back. At 80+ we were getting 25+ MPG Im 66" and this was the only mini SUV we found that had enough leg room for me (barely). We are satisified with it so far.

• 

  Very Good Value For The Money - 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
  By mlr - May 17 - 2:00 am

  At $14,000,the Tracker is a very good value. Good handling, adequate power, good gas mileage (22 to 28 mpg), and nicely equipped even with no factory options. However, that the Tracker is no CR-V or RAV4. Its ride is considerably busier, the quality of the materials is inferior and the rear seat is tight. Buyers who are considering more upscale Trackers (LT or ZR2) should be aware that the fancier Trackers, even with the big-time rebates, are approaching CR-V prices and I can attest that my CR-V outclasses my Tracker in many respects. People who want an inexpensive 4X4 will probably be pleased with a base Tracker.