Overview & Reviews

User Reviews:

• 

  Loved this car! - 1994 Chrysler Concorde
  By Laurie - November 19 - 4:17 pm

  Received this car from my aunt, when she got too old to drive. It had been garage-kept, and regularly maintained, so it was in great condition, and VERY LOW mileage. In fact, for a 20 year old car, it had 86,500 miles on it! Car runs very smooth. Great acceleration getting on the highway. Extremely comfortable to drive, and to be a rider. Front seat space is huge, and the back is quite comfortable, even for a long drive. The trunk is huge! We really had no use for it, and we wouldnt get very much for it, so we donated it to the Fire Department for training. So sad to say goodbye.

• 

  Great vehicle - 1998 Chrysler Concorde
  By E. Barto - November 15 - 6:41 pm

  This vehicle is great. Great interior, comfortable and very roomy and the trunk space is huge. It drives smoothly and handles well.

• 

  Well built - 2000 Chrysler Concorde
  By aweyea2000 - December 3 - 7:37 pm

  Had two of these cars with the 3.2 never had a serious issue with either one of them. Interior is very curvy, handles like a sports car and loves to be redlined.Even after 400,000 miles was still a darling until someone ran a light and killed her. Awesome car and the only Chrysler i ever loved. And at 32 mpg highway no complaints.

• 

  1998 Concorde LX - 2004 Chrysler Concorde
  By swent - April 1 - 4:09 pm

  I bought this car new in 1999. I have 168,000 miles on it and the only problems were ceramic brake pads are too hard and warp the rotors. Easy fix. Drive belt tensioner had to replaced twice and the exhaust valve seals needed to be replaced at 155,000. I just drove 1800 miles across country and got 29.5 mpg. Thats not bad for a car that has over 150,000 miles on it. Oh the standard tape deck is garbage.

• 

  Best Vehicle Ive ever owned - 2000 Chrysler Concorde
  By zenaeh92 - November 6 - 4:56 pm

  I purchased a 2000 chrysler Concorde over 2 years ago and shes my baby. 100% reliable and this year as most reviews have reflected some years are bad with leaks and so on however the 2000 was the year that they fixed the tranny and lower motor leaks and seemingly fixed the seizing motor issue.

• 

  freakin great ride! - 2001 Chrysler Concorde
  By joe436 - August 4 - 9:44 am

  My concord has 350,000 kilometers on her and she purrs like the first day she was purchased. regular fluid changes and minor undercarridge replacements, other than that, its very quick for a large car, best car I ever had, hope to make it to 500,000 ks at least.

• 

  I mustve been one of the lucky ones - 2001 Chrysler Concorde
  By dbusterplus - January 10 - 11:33 am

  Ive heard nothing but horrible things about the 2.7, yet Ive never experienced nearly the amount of hardships anyone else seems to have with this engine. My wife (fiance at the time) bought this car in July 04 with 31k miles on it. Its been nothing short of a workhorse for us. Of course at around 50k miles, the check engine light came on, and looking around online, I found tons of reports of the dreaded engine sludge fiasco, but it seems mine was a later 2001 model that avoided this issue. The light turned out to be for an emission issue that didnt affect how well the car ran. Now, in 2013, nearing 150k miles, I still drive it 60 miles a day with minimal upkeep.

• 

  Such an underrated car - 1993 Chrysler Concorde
  By toyotaofdothan - December 12 - 9:07 am

  Having grown up with Chrysler products I was biased and had a preference to them. Several years ago after much pressure I left the Dodge dealership I was at for a job with Toyota.. Now after a few years to look back and reflect while I cant say Toyota does not make a quality product I can clearly see the reviews for many years feel even more biased against the Chrysler products. This car is almost 20 years old, and due to southern sun has required a repaint. Other than that there are few parts that have ever been replaced on it. It does need a piece of trim along the windshield, and it sounds like there may be some play in a motor mount developing.

• 

  167,000 strong... good bang for the family sedan buck! - 2001 Chrysler Concorde
  By dlong163 - December 9 - 11:09 pm

  The 3.2 liter models were superb to other offerings at the time. If you dont like the exterior design, add a spoiler, and voila! This car is reliable, has never failed me. I have kept with regular maintenance since I received it at 114,000 miles, and the previous owner kept it and recorded it as well. The only major problems Ive encountered is the ABS pump failing (not a huge deal) and my frame was warped when I drove over an unmarked curb, causing a clunk I cant eliminate despite all new front suspension. I cant blame Chrysler for a business not marking their curbs. Overall, a great car. Ive met owners with 250K on their daily drivers, Im sure this one will make it!

• 

  Amazing Ride - 2000 Chrysler Concorde
  By kasmic253 - December 8 - 3:04 am

  I just bought a 2000 Concorde LXi for $3000 in Augest and im proud to say that this is an amazing yet huge car! I put 4 new Michelin tires on it but my father got the darkest window tints on it and I can barely see backing up at night...oh well. Id like to get a backup camera installed just for this reason. Fully loaded with practically everything reasonable. Sunroof, 4 disk cd changer, etc. Only probs are that the ride side of the cup holder is broke is annoying but looks funny and some of the paint is scratched because I brought from a concrete contracter guy and the passenenger window doesnt roll down but I am fixing it here soon. Amazing 3.2L DO NOT GET THE 2.7 OR YOU WILL REGRET IT!!!!